Admin: /* En inglés */

2024-04-02T22:10:56Z

En inglés

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 2 April 2024
Line 14:		Line 14:
	''Escribió Scott Hahn:''<blockquote>The Shroud of Turin is woven flax, made by a professional weaver, which was likely to have been owned by a wealthy man (like Joseph of Arimathea). The flax fibers are traceable to the Middle East. The stitching is similar to an artifact found at Masada, dated between 40 BC and AD 73. The cloth is dated to between 300 BC and 300 AD. Chemical tests prove there are blood stains on the Shroud (AB blood type). There are no paint pigments, ruling out the possibility of an artistic forgery. It bears the image of a grown male, 5’ 11” in height, with shoulder length hair and a beard—a victim of crucifixion in the Roman fashion.		''Escribió Scott Hahn:''<blockquote>The Shroud of Turin is woven flax, made by a professional weaver, which was likely to have been owned by a wealthy man (like Joseph of Arimathea). The flax fibers are traceable to the Middle East. The stitching is similar to an artifact found at Masada, dated between 40 BC and AD 73. The cloth is dated to between 300 BC and 300 AD. Chemical tests prove there are blood stains on the Shroud (AB blood type). There are no paint pigments, ruling out the possibility of an artistic forgery. It bears the image of a grown male, 5’ 11” in height, with shoulder length hair and a beard—a victim of crucifixion in the Roman fashion.

	A word to the skeptics… Whether the Shroud is or is not Jesus’ burial cloth, one thing is clear, science cannot explain how the impressions remain on the garment as with a photographic negative. Plus, when you read the resurrection account in John 20:3-7, John ran to the tomb and saw the “linen cloths” lying there; then Peter came in and also saw the “linen cloths” there (v. 5), along with the napkin, “not lying with the linen cloths but folded in a place by itself” (v. 7). Such detail. So who folded the cloths, the angels? Or, more likely, our Lord himself? In either case, the linen cloths meant something to John, as they should to us. The death of Jesus is historical, just as the resurrection is. And if you were John, I suspect you would have picked up the linen cloths. As would the guards or the enemies of Jesus, if they had arrived there first. Just be open to the possibility…</blockquote>[https://www.youtube.com/live/HAbuG-oVq1Q Fr. Andrew Dalton on the Shroud] (3h 7m)		A word to the skeptics… Whether the Shroud is or is not Jesus’ burial cloth, one thing is clear, science cannot explain how the impressions remain on the garment as with a photographic negative. Plus, when you read the resurrection account in John 20:3-7, John ran to the tomb and saw the “linen cloths” lying there; then Peter came in and also saw the “linen cloths” there (v. 5), along with the napkin, “not lying with the linen cloths but folded in a place by itself” (v. 7). Such detail. So who folded the cloths, the angels? Or, more likely, our Lord himself? In either case, the linen cloths meant something to John, as they should to us. The death of Jesus is historical, just as the resurrection is. And if you were John, I suspect you would have picked up the linen cloths. As would the guards or the enemies of Jesus, if they had arrived there first. Just be open to the possibility…[[File:34 trillion watts.jpg\|center\|thumb\|600x600px]]</blockquote>[https://www.youtube.com/live/HAbuG-oVq1Q Fr. Andrew Dalton on the Shroud] (3h 7m)

	[https://youtu.be/BRltpE-XMBE Science and the Shroud of Turin with Fr. Robert Spitzer] (1h 9m)		[https://youtu.be/BRltpE-XMBE Science and the Shroud of Turin with Fr. Robert Spitzer] (1h 9m)

	[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2076443/Turin-Shroud-created-flash-supernatural-light.html Turin Shroud 'was created by flash of supernatural light': It couldn't be a medieval forgery, say scientists]		[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2076443/Turin-Shroud-created-flash-supernatural-light.html Turin Shroud 'was created by flash of supernatural light': It couldn't be a medieval forgery, say scientists]

Admin: Created page with "La Síndone de Turín == Documentales == [https://youtu.be/KSa6p52s0As Veredicto científico sobre la Sábana Santa] (1h 17m) [https://youtu.be/lL0ckv4k0vU La Sábana Santa de Turín desde el punto de vista científico] (1h 25m) == Artículos interesantes == [https://www.abc.es/sociedad/abci-medico-espanol-sostiene-imagen-impresa-sabana-santa-persona-viva-202002090205_noticia.html?ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.abc.es%2Fsocieda..."

2024-04-02T22:10:08Z

Created page with "center|thumb|600x600px|La Síndone de Turín == Documentales == [https://youtu.be/KSa6p52s0As Veredicto científico sobre la Sábana Santa] (1h 17m) [https://youtu.be/lL0ckv4k0vU La Sábana Santa de Turín desde el punto de vista científico] (1h 25m) == Artículos interesantes == [https://www.abc.es/sociedad/abci-medico-espanol-sostiene-imagen-impresa-sabana-santa-persona-viva-202002090205_noticia.html?ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.abc.es%2Fsocieda..."

New page

[[File:Sábana Santa.jpg|center|thumb|600x600px|La Síndone de Turín]]

== Documentales ==
[https://youtu.be/KSa6p52s0As Veredicto científico sobre la Sábana Santa] (1h 17m)

[https://youtu.be/lL0ckv4k0vU La Sábana Santa de Turín desde el punto de vista científico] (1h 25m)

== Artículos interesantes ==
[https://www.abc.es/sociedad/abci-medico-espanol-sostiene-imagen-impresa-sabana-santa-persona-viva-202002090205_noticia.html?ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.abc.es%2Fsociedad%2Fabci-medico-espanol-sostiene-imagen-impresa-sabana-santa-persona-viva-202002090205_noticia.html Un médico español sostiene que la imagen impresa en la Sábana Santa es la de «una persona viva»]

[https://www.eldebate.com/cultura/20220509/sabana-santa-misterio-barba-cristo-arte-cristiano.html#image1 La sábana santa y el misterio del aspecto real de Jesucristo]

== En inglés ==
''Escribió Scott Hahn:''<blockquote>The Shroud of Turin is woven flax, made by a professional weaver, which was likely to have been owned by a wealthy man (like Joseph of Arimathea). The flax fibers are traceable to the Middle East. The stitching is similar to an artifact found at Masada, dated between 40 BC and AD 73. The cloth is dated to between 300 BC and 300 AD. Chemical tests prove there are blood stains on the Shroud (AB blood type). There are no paint pigments, ruling out the possibility of an artistic forgery. It bears the image of a grown male, 5’ 11” in height, with shoulder length hair and a beard—a victim of crucifixion in the Roman fashion.

A word to the skeptics… Whether the Shroud is or is not Jesus’ burial cloth, one thing is clear, science cannot explain how the impressions remain on the garment as with a photographic negative. Plus, when you read the resurrection account in John 20:3-7, John ran to the tomb and saw the “linen cloths” lying there; then Peter came in and also saw the “linen cloths” there (v. 5), along with the napkin, “not lying with the linen cloths but folded in a place by itself” (v. 7). Such detail. So who folded the cloths, the angels? Or, more likely, our Lord himself? In either case, the linen cloths meant something to John, as they should to us. The death of Jesus is historical, just as the resurrection is. And if you were John, I suspect you would have picked up the linen cloths. As would the guards or the enemies of Jesus, if they had arrived there first. Just be open to the possibility…</blockquote>[https://www.youtube.com/live/HAbuG-oVq1Q Fr. Andrew Dalton on the Shroud] (3h 7m)

[https://youtu.be/BRltpE-XMBE Science and the Shroud of Turin with Fr. Robert Spitzer] (1h 9m)

[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2076443/Turin-Shroud-created-flash-supernatural-light.html Turin Shroud 'was created by flash of supernatural light': It couldn't be a medieval forgery, say scientists]

Sábana Santa - Revision history

Admin: /* En inglés */